Gene Savoy, the discoverer of Pajaten, was an explorer, not a professional archaeologist. He first heard tales of mysterious ruins in the Andes from Peruvian hunters and outlaws. Savoy had already suspected that the eastern slopes of the Andes had once been inhabited by pre-Colombian civilizations and, in 1962, he made a flight over the region and spotted the ancient city. It was not until 1965 however, after farmers seeking new land opened a trail into the area, that he was able to get to the site. He made his initial trip through the forbidding jungle mountains on foot. When he reached Pajaten, its walls were barely visible through the thickets, but he realized he had come upon something important.

1966. Corbis Images. ''Original caption: Pajaten Ruins and Town of Pachiza and Juanjui. Pachiza, Peru: American explorer and photographer Gene Savoy of Bellingham, Wash., at Pajaten ruins. ''
Savoy persuaded the Peruvian government to sponsor a full-scale expedition which was joined by scholars and crews of workmen. They arrived in June, 1966, a company of thirty-seven ferried to mountaintop by helicopter, and established a rude headquarters there. Clearing the site proved to be a long job. The thick underbrush had to be burned off and then a mattress like layer of debris and root networks rolled back inch by inch, gradually freeing such structures as staircases which led to passageways between buildings.

''El complejo Arqueológico conocido como el Gran Pajatén, es una maravilla de la naturaleza y de la mano del hombre.''
”Mr. Savoy, who even founded his own religion, was a larger-than-life character and did not care who knew it. His quests were larger still: He sought the Fountain of Youth, the Treasure of El Dorado, proof that Solomon’s gold had come from South America( Based on stone tablets found in the highland jungle ) and what his son called “the answers to life.” His actual discoveries included Vilcabamba, the Incas’ last refuge from the Spanish, the place Hiram Bingham thought he had found with his discovery of Machu Picchu in 1911. He is also credited with finding Gran Pajatén, a pre-Incan stone city. And his discovery of Gran Vilaya, an intricate network of 24,000 stone structures covering 100 square miles of dense jungle, helped establish that a high civilization had existed in Peru apart from the coast and the Andes.” ( Douglas Martin)
Teams of workmen found a wall studded with stone heads between a tree stump on a ledge. These heads are surrounded with feathery headdresses of stone that are not surface inlays but comprise part of the wall itself. The builder evidently fitted them in as he worked, filling in around them with smaller pieces; an intricate mode of construction quite unlike Inca masonry. Savoy then explored the surrounding country and soon reported the existence of six more cities similar to Pajatan. He believed that these communities proved his hypothesis that Pajatan was part of a jungle empire the existence of which the Spanish conquerors never dreamed of, nor, indeed, did modern archeology until he came across it.
”One of the tombs we found on the cliff was incredible. It was two stories high. Lining the outside roof were six wooden, nude male statues, all showing an enhanced penis. When we first saw these statues, I said to Barbara, ‘Looks like the guy was a king looking forward to the future life, with all these statues and phallic symbols around the tomb’. She said, ‘What makes you think it wasn’t a woman looking forward to her future life?’ …I did find some vases and other artifacts, which helped Tom determine that they had unearthed a pre-Inca civilization, more than 3,000 years old.” ( Lou Whittaker )

''The latest discovery in the middle of the jungle promises new revelations about the mysterious Chachapoya civilization. While on a hunting trip last year, family members Octavio, Merlin and Edison Añazco literally bumped into something extraordinary: an enormous ruin including a ceremonial platform (approximately 100 ft. x 200 ft. x 24 ft.) overlooking a football field-sized plaza, a watch tower, as well as numerous rectangular and circular buildings.''











COMMENTS




Hi Dave:
There is a lot of misinformation out there. I did fieldwork at Gran Pajaten and surrounding sites for three months. For the record:
- Gran Pajaten was discovered in August, 1963 by a group of villagers from nearby Pataz, led by
mayor Tomas Torrealba,
- Photos of Building No. 1 appeared in newspapers, La Industria of Trujillo and El Comercio of
Lima in September and October of 1964
- archaeologist Rogger Ravines reported on the ruins with a brief description in the National
Museum Bulletin, also in 1964.
- the Peruvian government also led an expedition to the ruins on foot in 1965.
- Mr. Savoy could not possibly have seen Gran Pajaten from the air in 1962. These sites can
barely be seen on the ground.
If archaeologists could find some scientifically verifiable evidence for some of the trans-oceanic voyages proposed by Heyerdahl and savoy, then they would happily buy into the notions. At present, these theories are faith-based. I do not believe that the late Gene Savoy has looted archaeological sites. However, I do question his motivations for exploring, and his ethics. Here’s a quote from the LATimes (2004) regarding Torrealva’s discovery of Gran Pajaten,
“That’s nonsense, Savoy said. “Did they report these things before I found them?”
A native might see a wall covered with bush, he said. “We spend months and years exploring
a wide territory to uncover a lost metropolis. Who in their right mind is going to say that the
Indian is the discoverer?”
Did they report these things? Yes. In most cases the sites had been reported to the INC in Lima, in some cases by archaeologists. Some of us have spent months and years exploring and studying these sites… but then, we’re only scientists and Indians I guess.
You do like to be provocative, don’t you, Dave. Cheers! Warren
thanks again for the comment! A little bit. I know Savoy was not universally admired to say the least; a tireless self-promoter and an advocate of his own religion called cosology.You have given me some information, that I did not even have the potential to willfully ignore if I had chosen too, which is not likely given how thorough it is. Your description of ”faith based” theories is interesting as well. Perhaps Savoy would have termed your remarks ”provocative”. I respect the time you have taken to write this and when I return to this subject, there will be a little more circumspection on my part and I’ll communicate with you at that time. I do realize, at least in part, the tremendous amount of work your profession puts into these projects and I thank you again for your professional integrity. Best,
Dave
Thank YOU, Dave, for taking my (admittedly provocative) comments in a constructive spirit! Clearly there is an acrimonious divide between those who “explore and discover” the surface, and those who systematically dig. This is unfortunate, but neither party is completely innocent. I don’t gain anything by smearing the memory of the late Mr. Savoy. His re-discovery of lost Vilcabamba was the product of good research and dogged exploring, and I can respect and admire that.
I respect anybody’s right to look at the past any way they wish. Scientific archaeology is one way. Archaeologists certainly do not “own” the truth. Personally, I don’t believe that scientists are unable to see the forests for the trees (although that does describe some of them). I trained in archaeology because I find that it offers the most convincing method of arriving at what really happened when, why and how. It satisfies ME. It sparks my imagination, and real creativity is required to formulate the “right” questions… or at least interesting questions.
So, Dave, thanks for letting the phuddy-duddy ramble. Here’s to intellectual diversity… salud!
Are there any pictures or photos of the petroglyphs / geoglyphs found there?
it really is interesting. Indiana Jones was apparently a composite based in part on some of the spirit of Savoy. It is very hard to locate the kinds of photographs you are looking for. best