We were born before the wind
Also younger than the sun
Ere the bonnie boat was won as we sailed into the mystic
Hark, now hear the sailors cry
Smell the sea and feel the sky
Let your soul and spirit fly into the mystic
And when that fog horn blows I will be coming home
And when the fog horn blows I want to hear it
I don’t have to fear it
And I want to rock your gypsy soul
Just like way back in the days of old
And magnificently we will flow into the mystic
When that fog horn blows you know I will be coming home
And when that fog horn whistle blows I got to hear it
I don’t have to fear it
And I want to rock your gypsy soul
Just like way back in the days of old
And together we will flow into the mystic
Come on girl… ( Van Morrison, Into the Mystic )
”The procession of phenomenal narrative pictures that constitute its core makes it clear that we do Turner no favors by pinning the tinny little medal of First Modernist on him. Subject matter meant a great deal to him, and if claiming him for the poetry or the physics of light blinds us to the seriousness with which he yearned to be Britain’s first great history painter, he would not have thanked us. What, I believe, he wanted us to see was that, as far as the monumental oils were concerned, all his radical formal experimentation—the trowellings and the “mortary” quality of the paint surface that his critics complained of, the scrapings and rubbings and stainings—was at the service of those grand narratives.” ( Simon Schama )
The fallacy of hope as an eternal recurrence; the drama of history repeating itself in infinite variations on the same theme. A Myth of Sisyphus except putting down the rock, grab a brush and paint our obsessions instead of crying of crying in a pint of stout at the pub. Occasionally, Joseph William Mallord Turner adopted moralistic themes, but when he did so there was always a special reason. ”Dido Building Carthage” and its companion, ”The Decline of the Cathaginian Empire” , took their theme from Thomson’s long poem ”Liberty” , and warned by historical example that a nation must preserve the virtues that made it great, or must fall. But this high minded theme was only a corollary to Turner’s deliberate intention of painting two pictures that could stand comparison with the masters of the past; especially Claude Lorrain. In spite of their themes the pictures themselves are notable only and splendidly for their pictorial worth. Their philosophical content is dependent upon the accompanying literary exposition.
This was always true of Turner, no matter what sops he threw to the public by tying literary or topical references to exhibited pictures. He began composing verses of his own for this purpose, and in 1812 there appeared the first quotation from a poem with the cheerless title ”Fallacies of Hope” ; supposedly a work of epic length that Turner dabbled with over the years but a work that was never seen. The quoted lines were probably written for each occasion, and were quite embarrassingly ill-written. Turner’s thin acquaintance with humanistic learning has been regarded as a disadvantage accounting for the feeble classicism of his mythological subjects , but more perceptively it has been recognized as an advantage that gave his originality full play.
But none of this tells us much about Turner’s personality. For a man so famous, he managed to keep his private life private to a degree that has left him indecipherable. He wrote almost no letters and never went out in society. Did he have froends amonfg the sailors and fisherman and woman of the ports where he went to sketch? He used to hire small fishing boats to take him out in rough weather and once had himself lashed to the mast for four hours to observe the natural effects of a snow
m , wondering all the while, he admitted later, whether he would survive the experience.”With opportunity and encouragement, if the pages of Virgil were splayed before a curious youth, it matters not if the receptive mind is installed at day school New Brentford as was Turner, or Eton in the shadow of Windsor Castle. Although it is impossible to ascertain at this point, but Turner might even have been dyslexic; he was certainly a visual learner, which is often an indicator of this state. Regardless of his outward manifestations and innermost riddles, according to Rev. S.A Swaine, one must nevertheless appreciate Turner for his humanity. And this of course can be instilled anywhere:
‘Turner was as merciful an angler as even the pious and humane father of the craft could have desired. He would impale the devoted worm ‘as tenderly as he loved him’”… and according to a regular fishing companion, “his success as an angler was great, although with the worst of tackle in the world. Every fish he caught he showed to me, and appealed to me to decide whether the size justified him to keep it for the table, or return it to the river; his hesitation was often most touching, and he always gave the prisoner at the bar the benefit of the doubt.”
The friends he is known to have had, respected his privacy. By the time he was thirty-five, and perhaps much earlier, he was making annual visits to his friend Walter Fawkes of Farnley Hall, Yorkshire; visits that continued until Fawkes died in 1825. During this time Turner had formed a friendship with the earl of Egremont and had made some trips to his seat at Petworth. When Turner was fifty-four, his father died, in September, 1829, and he began at Petworth, the most intensely personal expression of his genius.
Turner’s work, in many senses, defies categorization in that it reflected a murky yet lucid understanding of the spirit world and the emergence of an order, apparently chaotic, out of nothing. As Christopher Hitchens says, ” religion has run out of justifications” , and Turner pictorially asked the question: ”But what is this mysterious human nature which is seen as the source of all our ills, and is alleged to be eternally unchangeable?” This is a profoundly philosophical question, to which not many would venture a reply, unless they were of a religious cast of mind, in which case they would say that God, in His wisdom, made us like that.
Turner seemed to imply that why anyone should worship a Being that played such tricks on His creations is another matter. Most people usually succeed in muddling through life, until some great upheaval compels them to re-consider the kind of ideas and values they grew up with. The crisis of society forces them to question many things they took for granted. At such times, ideas which seemed remote suddenly become strikingly relevant, and Turner at the nascent beginning and then flowering of the Industrial Age and pure capitalism saw these cataclysmic circumstances unfold at the crossroads between his own yearning for a return to a lost Arcadia, restrained by a deep curiosity and ambiguous desire to embrace a new era that would add new impetus to existing emotions of agony, torment and passion; life as a tumor that alternated between the malignant and the benign.