“I pledge allegiance…”

Are we Rome in decline, a dying society? One may doubt that we have reached that point of dissolution, where in the phrase of Giovanni Battista Vico men “finally go mad and waste their substance.” One may doubt the ultimately astrological intuitions of an Oswald Spengler. In fact, civilizations are not ruled by the stars. But something is there.

The crisis transcends America. There is a near universal conviction that something is radically wrong, unaccountably awry, and the feeling is more than troubled; it is bitter. Nowhere in our Western world today is there a revolutionary who could say, as did the youthful William Wordsworth greeting the French Revolution, that “all the world was young and to be young was very heaven.” The new mood is dark and it brings to mind an astute dictum of Oswald Spengler’s: “Only the sick man feels his limbs.”

Tabatha Southey:And she presents worse, a fact she continues to blame on the “lamestream media” she compulsively courts. This tour is partly intended to reprimand them. “I want them to have to do a little bit of work on a tour like this, and that would include not necessarily telling them beforehand where every stop is going to be,” she said. “I don't think I owe anything to the mainstream media.” And so she and her husband, Todd, are making like John and Yoko – rushing about, ducking and weaving, with media in tow. It’s difficult to see how anyone involved in her tour sincerely thinks that this will win her any new supporters. I can’t imagine capriciousness is a quality very many Americans are looking for in a president. No one wants that stock movie character now known as the Manic Pixie Dream Girl to have the nuclear codes. Of course, the media play along, to the dismay of many, who maintain that if the press ignored her, she'd go away. I don't think this is the case. I think she'd just try harder. She might wrestle an alligator or something. Fame is hard to kick. Read More:http://politico-junkie.blogspot.com/2011/06/canada-palins-campaign.html image:http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/154039/20110529/sarah-palin-kicks-off-one-nation-tour-in-d-c-on-a-harley-photos.htm

 

There is a sense of possibilities foreclosed, of problems too big, of a failure of nerve of a whole society. But perhaps it is not so much a matter of diminishing elan as of age. The world is not new anymore; modern individuals carry a vast weight of self-conscious history on their backs. Indeed, what underlies the contemporary sense of unease, the striving for forced, and false parallels with the Rome of the winter years, is just this very sense of deja-vu. We feel, even if our grasp of detail is shaky, that somehow it has all happened before and will happen again. Thus the search for the pattern of history in our day.

To the English historian Arnold Toynbee, his message was a little less dark. The breakdown of a society was not an inner necessity- the consequence of some darkly apprehended, if indefinable, universal law. According to his A Study of History, breakdown occurs when a society fails to respond successfully to challenge. In Toynbee’s system, the “creative minority” that leads the civilization in its growth phase suffers a failure of creativity and self-confidence. aaa aaaa

---Lady Gaga is no puppet for the Illuminati. She is a highly charismatic and multitalented figure whose symbol-laden presentations are evidence not of occult involvements, but of a strategic, effective, and very canny self-display centering obsessively on one concern: fame and the mechanisms that produce and support it. Sociologist of religion Max Weber defined charisma as “a certain quality of an individual personality, by virtue of which one is ‘set apart’ from ordinary people and treated as endowed with supernatural, superhuman, or at least specifically exceptional powers or qualities.” These qualities, Weber writes, “are not accessible to the ordinary person, but are regarded as divine in origin or as exemplary, and on the basis of them the individual concerned is treated as a leader.”--- Read More:http://gagajournal.blogspot.com/2010/06/from-symbol-to-style-lady-gagas-secret.html

 

The society, homogenous in its earlier phases, splits into a “dominant minority” that no longer leads by exerting a magnetic charm over the mass but rules by regimentation and repression. Toynbee sees this process of decline as a lengthy affair. The society breaks down to enter a period of intermittent fratricidal wars; this is the “Time of Troubles.” Though the years of decline may be interrupted by seemingly successful rallies, once the breakdown occurs and the society is splintered, nothing can save it.

As the fragmentation increases, the dominant minority will attempt to pacify the society by erecting what Toynbee calls a universal state- an empire on the model of Rome that secures a dubious peace at the cost of repression, standardization, and ultimately the death of all creative thought. aaa aaa

---I suppose at this point I should mention The Conquest of Cool: Business Culture, Counterculture, and the Rise

Hip Consumerism by Thomas Frank.--- Read More:http://classic.tcj.com/blog/silly-clothes/

 

To Toynbee, a sure sign of incipient decline is not merely the drying up of creativity but the tendency of the ruling elite to adopt the habits, thought, and dress,diversion and religion of those whom the society in its growth phase attracted rather than repressed, intimidated rather than imitated, so that, as in late republican Rome, the great senatorial families found themselves practicing the vices of their slaves and worshiping their gods as well. To Toynbee, this is seen as a disdain for classical painting such as Botticelli for example in favor of pop art; the absence of ancestral style. Somewhat cynically, its hard to put too much faith in the pieties of a Toynbee and the type of verbal religiosities he entangles the reader with. But, something is there; but our focus on morals, societal trends, and given situations usually leads us to distraction from the basic economic structure and its endless search for the “new”:

Taibbi:Perhaps the most irritating facet of all of these transactions is the fact that hundreds of millions of Fed dollars were given out to hedge funds and other investors with addresses in the Cayman Islands. Many of those addresses belong to companies with American affiliations — including prominent Wall Street names like Pimco, Blackstone and . . . Christy Mack. Yes, even Waterfall TALF Opportunity is an offshore company. It's one thing for the federal government to look the other way when Wall Street hotshots evade U.S. taxes by registering their investment companies in the Cayman Islands. But subsidizing tax evasion? Giving it a federal bailout? What the fuck? Read More:http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-real-housewives-of-wall-street-look-whos-cashing-in-on-the-bailout-20110411?page=3

Joseph Heath: For example, it is Veblen who, at the close of the 19th century, observed that “The exigencies of the modern industrial system frequently place individuals and households in juxtaposition between whom there is little contact in any other sense than that of juxtaposition. One’s neighbors, mechanically speaking, often are socially not one’s neighbors, or even acquaintances; and still their transient good opinion has a high degree of utility… It is evident, therefore, that the present trend of the development is in the direction of heightening the utility of conspicuous consumption as compared with leisure” that reveals a more profound grasp of the underlying dynamics of the capitalist system….

Barbara Kruger. Read More:http://blog.wfuv.org/?p=6697

ADDENDUM:

Heath: …Yet in retrospect, it seems clear that many of these critics were simply appalled at how many of their own “leisure class” habits Veblen’s critique unmasked. (His classification of “high culture” as merely another form of conspicuous consumption was a particular sticking-point with Theodor Adorno, who described Veblen’s attitude in this regard as “splenetic,” “misanthopic,” and “melancholy” [1941, 393 & 407])….

….Status is the central concept in Veblen’s analytical framework. Status is, in his view, more fundamental than class, private property, or any other economic concept. Indeed, a proper understanding of status is essential to understanding any of the routine assumptions made by
economists, such as the “irksomeness” of labor and the desirability of leisure (Veblen, 1898). Veblen conceives of status among humans as a stratification system, no different in principle from the hierarchies that structure social relations throughout the animal kingdom (from the “pecking order” among chickens to the dominance relations among our closest primate ancestors). It is grounded in judgments that establish an invidious comparison, which Veblen defines as a “comparison of persons with a view to rating and grading them in respect of relative worth or value” (1899, 34)….Read More:http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/~jheath/veblen.pdf

This entry was posted in Feature Article, Ideas/Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>