Andre Le Notre laid out many noble gardens which soon became world famous. Versailles in particular was envied by every prince in Europe. And in the century and more that followed, these royal gardens were copied all over the civilized world. Sometimes the results were worthy of the models, as in Austria and Russia, but sometimes they were much less happy, like the European gardens in China which look very odd indeed and quite irresistibly like fairgrounds.
Versailles is the apotheosis of the formal garden, but what of the others- the landscape gardens which we know of first from the paintings of ancient China? The landscape style, though really no more natural than the formal garden, gives the impression that this delightful scene we have come on is simply a happy accident of nature. There is no question here of a plot enclosed, nothing formal or symmetrical, no straight lines or rigid divisions; the trees and shrubs seem to grow by chance, as if without human interference. It is a style which needs great skill and sensitivity if it is to succeed, and it needs a fertile climate if the plants are to thrive without irrigation. But for whatever reason, Western gardeners had no conception at all of a landscape style. What interest there was in ornamental planting outside the enclosed garden had been concerned with trees: trees for temples and sacred groves, worshiped as shrines or dedicated to the gods.
But the love of trees and of landscape only began to have influence in the eighteenth century, first in England where the romantic landscape style developed in revolt against the tyranny of formal gardening, and predictably, it quickly grew to the height of extravagant fashion. Its most famous exponent was Lancelot Brown, nicknamed Capability Brown because he would always find capabilities of improvement in the sites he was given for gardens. He designed in a deceptively simple-seeming style with sweeps of grass and clumps of trees and picturesquely winding water, using this natural material to emphasize the inherent character of the landscape.
In nineteenth-century Europe there was no new gardening style. The formal garden continued or was revived, though the classical vision was lost, and by the end of the century the herbaceous border and the woodland garden developed in revolt against the mechanical degeneration of carpet-bedding.
ADDENDUM:
Reverend William Hanbury ( 1758)
” I may perhaps be reckoned an Enthusiast when I assert that I am really surprised that Men of Fortune do not employ their Time in this manner. I am very certain that the other Amusements they run into are so far from being able to stand in Competition with that more profitable one (of gardening) that the very naming of them with it would be sufficient Invective: Let each Gentleman consider them in his own Mind: He will see the force of what I say: Let him reflect upon Horses and Dogs, Wine and Women, Cards and Folly etc., and then upon Planting. Will not the last engross his whole Mind,
appear worthy of employing all his Attention? Can there be a more genteel, a more rational Amusement? Can any thing tend more to the preserving of Health, and the prolonging of Life? Can any thing be more innocent, or productive of greater Pleasure?” Read More:http://www.scholarisland.org/garden.htm