The industry of memory. A industry setting boundaries on how we remember and the nature of interpretation. Ultimately, you can’t really portray real life tragedy. Even the original experiences of the holocaust victims, those closest to near death experiences are unable to extricate memory from the accompanying trauma and other mediating factors. Its more about a need for a symbol to mourn for us, an object of disavowal of it being better her and the ever present “other” than us. The holocaust and Anne Frank as symbol, is about everything: ethics, morals, politics, aesthetics, and so on. Everything, that is, except religion, the factor that made the final solution inevitable. I suppose Anne Frank is a way of getting a taste of the dark, dark light, without really walking into it. Maybe as Elie Wiesel said, god is terrible and all powerful; in that case why does he keep believing in god?
Jew for a day ( see link at end): …For embarrassment (or should it be revulsion), … has posted for an Amsterdam garret apartment where “one can live like Anne Frank”(*) (What happens to the tenant when the lease is up?). This type of branding, like the trend in European “Jewish style” cafes (which Ruth has written about) that stereotype Jews (as Africans, American Indians, and others are also still stereotyped world in advertising worldwide) is mostly disgusting and sometimes dangerous.
Its one thing when Gene Wilder plays a rabbi and dons payes in The Frisco Kid – a funny film that actually is both an affirmation of Judaism and a historic corrective – since there were plenty of Jews who helped shape the American West. And the case can be made for Barbara Streisand dressing up as Yentl. But it is quite another thing when an Ukrainian café owner encourages customers to dress up as Hasids to laugh and eat and drink on the very site the Lviv’s destroyed Beth Midrash, in the shadow of the ruined Golden Rose Synagogue, whose worshipers were rounded up an murdered. No matter what one thinks of the strictures of the Hasidim, the place of their death is no place for caricature. There is no one to answer back….
…Commercializing Holocaust suffering (or stoicism or heroism) – through ignorance or malice cannot be condoned. Even when done in way that is meant to celebrate the victim (Ann Frank), such exploitation actually belittles her. Maybe the apartment owner figured if Broadway, Hollywood and publishers around the world could make money selling their version of Anne Frank “why not me, too.” After all, the Ann Frank House is a big Amsterdam tourist destination. Why shouldn’t the neighbors cash in? Read More:http://eindpunt.blogspot.ca/2011/04/joodse-gemeenschap-strijdend-ten-onder.html
In the end, the Shoah is proverbially “stiff necked” and is resourceful in finding ways to escape from the reality of daily gravity we have subjected it to, entering new realms not inherent in the nature of known ideologies, a world unreal and in the uncharted waters of our current belief systems.
In the 1970s and 80s there were attacks by neo-Nazis who doubted the authenticity of the diary, unfounded accusations of forgery which were quickly refuted. But a feeling of the vulnerability of the myth came up: there were protests against the investigation that was carried out and even inquiries in parliament. It was therefore helpful in this context that the commentated, critical edition of the (almost) unabridged diary was published in 1986. But this edition did not change the fact that primarily Jewish Americans still found fault with what they see as a superficial description. They criticize the “Anne Frank industry” and the established institutions such as the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam or the Anne Frank Fund in Basel as well as the appropriation of Anne Frank by other groups and institutions. A further edition appeared in 2001….