If we look at the Thirty Years War, we can see that “incidents” if and of themselves, dod not precipitate the general war that engulfed Europe. The revolt in Prague no more created the war than the conspiracy in Venice had done, or the war in the Adriatic, or the war over Montferrat, or the affair of Julich-Cleves, or the Palatinate. And yet later, in 1621, real war broke out, bringing devastation and revolution to Europe for the next three decades. How then, did this happen? To seek an answer to this question, it is best to turn away from facile assumption that war rises spontaneously out of “incidents” and look instead at the men who create incidents and are the real makers of history.
The European war that broke out in 1621 was caused not by accumulated accidents but by human decisions. Those decisions were taken in Madrid. The questions we must ask are: Who were the men who made those decisions and why did they make them? The men were a party of Spanish officials who came to power in Madrid in 1621, and they made war deliberately because, unlike their predecessors, they believed that war would be more profitable to Spain than peace. ( to be continued)…
ADDENDUM:
(see link at end)…Some notes on War and Peace in the 20th Century, by Eric Hosbawm, in War and Peace in the 20th Century and Beyond, edited by Geir Lundestad and Olav Njostad. Proceedings of the Nobel Centennial Symposium/ World Scientific. New Jersey, London, Singapore, Hong Kong, 2002.
(…) “We may regard the period 1914 to 1945 as a single “Thirty Years War”, broken only by a short pause in the 1920′s”. (…) – E Hobsbawm.
It is interesting that Eric Hobsbawm came up with that idea of the Thirty Years war (1914-1945). Unfortunately there is more to that idea and story. Read More:http://www.principiadialectica.co.uk/blog/?p=1596