Although the human shape was designed by the greatest of artists, His taste does not necessarily coincide with ours; at no time did man accept the image in which he was created as final…
…Another, far more enduring, not to say endearing, sort of body deformation is obesity. Admired in many parts of the world, obesity has rated- as far as women are concerned- as a secondary sexual characteristic. To judge from prehistoric art, fat women either predominated or were used by choice as artists’ models, and in the course of time the well-upholstered woman was favoured over the scrawny one. A similar taste can frequently be found in modern art; the artist who does not limit his sympathies to the fashionable disembodied female sides with the primitive and celebrates massive womanhood.
Since only women of leisure can afford the luxury of being immobilized, the languid and overfed woman came to represent the well-to-do and beautiful; obesity became a mark of quality. Among those primitives who gauge female beauty by sheer bulk, brides-to-be go through preparations of excessive fattening. On reaching puberty, a girl was placed in a special fattening-hut. The time of seclusion varied from six months to two years, depending on the wealth of her parents.
Some tribes discriminated in their admiration for obesity between overall bulk and specific, strategically placed cushions of fat. The most celebrated among salient features is steatopygia, the overdevelopment of the subcutaneous fat that covers a woman’s hind parts and upper thighs. Unlike the judges of our beauty contests, who have their eyes on a prominently cantilevered bosom, buttock lovers, according to Darwin, would make their selection by “ranging their women in a line, and by picking her out who projects farthest a tergo.”